CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
235/50 R20
/
4740
4950 mm
1890
1930 mm
1688
1730 mm
2870
2850 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
15.4
20 Km/L
58
65 L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear View Camera
✓
Electric
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Speed Alert DSA: Display Only
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
280 HP - 284 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
Piano Black Honey-Comb
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear Bumper Guard
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
3.3L
2.5 L
Hybrid
Hybrid
Turbocharge
/
e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)
/
280 HP
240 BHP
284 PS @ 5000 RPM
/
450
237 Nm
450 NM @ 2000 RPM
/
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD TAKUMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.