CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

4

/

GCC

Dimensions

8

7 Seater

275/45 R21

/

5120

4950 mm

1994

1930 mm

1736

1730 mm

3120

2850 mm

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

14.3/14.6

20 Km/L

74

65 L

/

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Rear Camera With Dynamic Lines

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake

/

/

Power Door Lock

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

12

/

BOSE

/

Transmission

/

8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.3 L - 3.3 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

340 HP - 345 BHP

240 BHP - 240 BHP

8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic

Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Hybrid & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

6 - 8

7 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

Piano Black

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Rear Bumper Moulding: Bright

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

3.3L

2.5 L

Hybrid

Hybrid

Turbocharge

/

e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)

/

340 HP

240 BHP

345 PS @ 5000 RPM \ 284 PS @ 5000 RPM

/

500 /450

237 Nm

500 NM @ 2000 RPM \ 450 NM @ 2000 RPM

/

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM has a wheelbase of 3120, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-90 HYBRID 3.3 TURBO AWD PREMIUM uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.