Defender 90 SE Base (P300) vs Defender 90 SE Base (P300) Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
191 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4583 mm
/
2008 mm
/
1969 mm
/
2587 mm
/
397 L
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
88.5 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5 L
/
300 BHP - 635
/
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 - 8 Seater
/
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
300 BHP
/
400 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Defender 90 SE Base (P300)
Defender 90 SE Base (P300)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDefender 90 SE Base (P300)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Defender 90 SE Base (P300) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Defender 90 SE Base (P300) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE Base (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while Defender 90 SE Base (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.