CarteaCompare CarsDefender 90 SE Base (P300) vs Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Defender 90 SE Base (P300) vs Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

191 km/h

220 km/h

/

6

/

3598 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4583 mm

5539 mm

2008 mm

1875 mm

1969 mm

1857 mm

2587 mm

3487 mm

397 L

1005 L

/

4 Doors

/

254 m

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

11 Km/L

88.5 L

83 L

10 Km/L

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

3.6 L

300 BHP - 635

285 BHP

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 8 Seater

5 Seater

Engine

2.0 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

300 BHP

285 BHP

400 Nm

352 Nm

/

V

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    • Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Rear Defogger
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickGladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 90 SE Base (P300) if you care more about power; choose Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Toyota | Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Toyota | Prado Adventure Mono Tone 2.4T

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

    VS

    Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L has a wheelbase of 3487 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE Base (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L uses All Wheel Drive.