Defender 90 SE Base (P300) vs NX350 F Sport 2.4L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
191 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
2390 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4583 mm
4660 mm
2008 mm
1865 mm
1969 mm
1670 mm
2587 mm
2690 mm
397 L
320 L
/
5 Doors
/
160 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
88.5 L
55 L
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5 L
2.4 L - 2.5 L
300 BHP - 635
240 BHP - 275
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & CVT Transmission
Gasoline
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 8 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
300 BHP
274 BHP
400 Nm
430 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
Defender 90 SE Base (P300)
NX350 F Sport 2.4L
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDefender 90 SE Base (P300)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Defender 90 SE Base (P300) if you care more about price; choose NX350 F Sport 2.4L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while NX350 F Sport 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while NX350 F Sport 2.4L has a wheelbase of 2690 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, NX350 F Sport 2.4L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE Base (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while NX350 F Sport 2.4L uses All Wheel Drive.