Defender 90 SE (P300) vs Captiva LS Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

191 km/h

/

4

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

/

4583 mm

/

2008 mm

/

1969 mm

/

2587 mm

/

397 L

1051L

/

18

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

88 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

Interior

/

3.5

/

/

diagonal display

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Safety

/

2 Front and sides

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10.4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

4

Transmission

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

Mcpherson

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

1.5 L - 3.0 L

300 BHP - 635

144 BHP - 264 BHP

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 8 Seater

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Engine

V

/

2.0 L

1.5 T

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

/

300 BHP

144 BHP

400 Nm

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

HALOGEN

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Manual

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 90 SE (P300)

    • Captiva LS

      • Keyless Entry
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Rear Camera
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Number of Airbags
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Positive

    • Economical fuel consumption
    • Comfortable and spacious interior space
    • Competitive price for specifications

    Negative

    • Average engine performance
    • The quality of interior materials need to improve
    • A feature limited entertainment system

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickCaptiva LS

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about power; choose Captiva LS if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2025 Limited+ 3.6L Plus

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 Limited 3.6L Plus

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2023 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive.