Defender 90 SE (P300) vs Toyota Fortuner 2024 2.7L Smart (4X2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
191 km/h
180
4
4
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4583 mm
4.795
2008 mm
1.855
1969 mm
1.835
2587 mm
2.750
397 L
348
/
✓
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
8.3
88 L
80
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5.0 L
2.4 L - 4.0 L
300 BHP - 517 BHP
147 BHP - 235 BHP
Automatic
6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 8 Seater
7 Seater
Engine
V
/
2.0 L
2700 L
Gasoline
Petrol
Single Turbo
/
300 BHP
160 BHP
400 Nm
245
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Defender 90 SE (P300)
Toyota Fortuner 2024 2.7L Smart (4X2)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Toyota Fortuner 2024 2.7L Smart (4X2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Toyota Fortuner 2024 2.7L Smart (4X2) has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, Defender 90 SE (P300) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Toyota Fortuner 2024 2.7L Smart (4X2) has a wheelbase of 2.750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Defender 90 SE (P300), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while Toyota Fortuner 2024 2.7L Smart (4X2) uses Rear Wheel Drive.