Defender 90 SE (P300) vs Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
191 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
GCC
GCC
/
1996 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4583 mm
4914 mm
2008 mm
2207 mm
1969 mm
1842 mm
2587 mm
2900 mm
397 L
259 L
/
225 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
12 Km/L
88 L
80 L
10 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5 L
2.0 L - 2.3 L
300 BHP - 635
170 BHP - 296 BHP
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 8 Seater
5 - 5
Engine
V
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Single Turbo
/
300 BHP
170 BHP
400 Nm
405 Nm
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Defender 90 SE (P300)
Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Positive
- Perfect performance in off-road driving
- Powerful and modern exterior design
- Advanced interior equipment and driving comfort
Negative
- Fuel consumption is relatively high
- Interior details need to be developed
- The entertainment system needs to improve the user interface
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about power; choose Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel uses Four Wheel Drive.