CarteaCompare CarsDefender 90 SE (P300) vs Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L

Defender 90 SE (P300) vs Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

191 km/h

240 km/h

4

6

GCC

Japanese

/

3798 cc

Dimensions

5 Seater

8 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4583 mm

5350 mm

2008 mm

2030 mm

1969 mm

1945 mm

2587 mm

3075 mm

397 L

836 L

/

244 m

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

88 L

97 L

10 Km/L

9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

3-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)

300 BHP - 635

275 BHP - 495 BHP

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 8 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Engine

V

V

2.0 L

3.8 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

None

300 BHP

316 BHP

400 Nm

386 Nm

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 90 SE (P300)

    • Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Positive

    • Outstanding off-road performance
    • Outstanding engine power
    • Spacious and luxurious interior design

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Slow electronic system response

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickDefender 90 SE (P300)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about price; choose Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2025 Limited+ 3.6L Plus

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 Limited 3.6L Plus

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2023 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L has a wheelbase of 3075 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L uses Four Wheel Drive .