CarteaCompare CarsDefender 90 SE (P300) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Defender 90 SE (P300) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

191 km/h

210 km/h

4

6

GCC

GCC

/

3490 cc

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4583 mm

5115 mm

2008 mm

1980 mm

1969 mm

1920 mm

2587 mm

2890 mm

397 L

1004 L

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

9.4 Km/L

88 L

110 L

10 Km/L

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

3.3 L - 5.7 L

300 BHP - 635

240 BHP - 409

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 8 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Engine

V

V

2.0 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Twin Turbo

300 BHP

271 BHP

400 Nm

385 Nm

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 90 SE (P300)

    • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Sensor Rear Tailgate
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Positive

    • Powerful off-road capabilities
    • Exceptional reliability and durability
    • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickDefender 90 SE (P300)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2025 Limited+ 3.6L Plus

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 Limited 3.6L Plus

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L

    Land Rover | Defender 90 SE (P300)

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2023 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Defender 90 SE (P300) is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.