CarteaCompare CarsDiscovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR

Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

225 km/h

200

/

8

Dimensions

5 Seater

8 Seater

4599 mm

5170

2069 mm

1980

1724 mm

1930

2741 mm

2850

981 L

456

Fuel Economy

14.5 Km/L

6.9

67 L

138

14.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.0 L

3.3 L - 5.7 L

249 BHP - 355 BHP

240 BHP - 409

TBD

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

4.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

249 BHP

304 BHP

365 Nm

439

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDiscovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) if you care more about price; choose Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Land Rover | Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250)

VS

Mercedes Benz | EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC

Land Rover | Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250)

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR

Land Rover | Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250)

VS

Ford | Ford Bronco 2021 2.7T Big Lands

Land Rover | Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250)

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2024 2.7T V6 Reserve LUX PKG

Land Rover | Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250)

VS

Porsche | Porsche Macan 2020 S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR has a fuel consumption of 14.49. Therefore, Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) has a wheelbase of 2741 mm, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR has a wheelbase of 2850. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Discovery Sport 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (P250) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR uses All Wheel Drive.