EC6 Standard Range vs Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1996 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2292
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
4849
4914 mm
1995
2207 mm
1697
1842 mm
2888 mm
2900 mm
/
259 L
/
225 m
Fuel Economy
/
12 Km/L
/
80 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
Fabric
✓
Digital
✓
Electric
✓
/
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.8"
10
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
23
8
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
490 BHP
170 BHP - 296 BHP
AT
10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic
Electric
Diesel & Gasoline
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
2.0 L - 2.3 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Diesel
490 BHP
170 BHP
550 Nm
405 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Motor
150
/
Technologies
9
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EC6 Standard Range
- Remote key types
Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Perfect performance in off-road driving
- Powerful and modern exterior design
- Advanced interior equipment and driving comfort
Negative
- Fuel consumption is relatively high
- Interior details need to be developed
- The entertainment system needs to improve the user interface
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EC6 Standard Range if you care more about power; choose Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EC6 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Standard Range uses All Wheel Drive , while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel uses Four Wheel Drive.