EC6 Standard Range vs Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
237 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2292
/
4 Doors
/
4849
4753 mm
1995
1893 mm
1697
1659 mm
2888 mm
2808 mm
/
550 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.7 Km/L
/
70 L
/
13.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
/
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
490 BHP
211 BHP - 272 BHP
AT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 Seater - 6 Seater
/
2.0 L - 3.2 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
490 BHP
252 BHP
550 Nm
370 Nm
Motor
150
/
Technologies
9
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EC6 Standard Range
- Remote key types
Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEC6 Standard Range
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EC6 Standard Range if you care more about price; choose Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design has a fuel consumption of 7.3. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EC6 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design has a wheelbase of 2808 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EC6 Standard Range, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Standard Range uses All Wheel Drive , while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design uses All Wheel Drive.