EC6 Standard Range vs GLA 250 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
2292
1,600
4 Doors
/
4849
4,410
1995
1,834
1697
1,611
2888 mm
2,729
Fuel Economy
/
6.6 L/100 km
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
/
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
490 BHP
/
AT
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
5
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
490 BHP
224 hp
550 Nm
/
/
165
/
350 Nm
Motor
150
/
Technologies
9
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EC6 Standard Range
- Remote key types
GLA 250 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLA 250 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EC6 Standard Range if you care more about interior space; choose GLA 250 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EC6 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while GLA 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,729. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EC6 Standard Range, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Standard Range uses All Wheel Drive , while GLA 250 4MATIC uses No data.