EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
180 km/h
/
6
/
2698 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490 mm
4800 mm
1874 mm
1937 mm
1613 mm
1962 mm
2750 mm
2950 mm
/
4 Doors
/
562 L
/
260 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.2 Km/L
/
79 L
/
9.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
7
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
181 - 418 BHP
TBD
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 Seater
4 - 5
/
2.3 L - 3.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
153 BHP
330 BHP
340 Nm
542 Nm
/
V
/
2.7 L
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Bronco Badlands 2.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and iconic design
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Multiple engine options
Negative
- High price for top categories
- Limited internal storage space
- Significant fuel consumption
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about price; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.