EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4490 mm
4785
1874 mm
1930
1613 mm
1625
2750 mm
2880
/
20"
Fuel Economy
/
56
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
/
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
496 hp
TBD
AT & single-speed AT
Electric
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
/
5 Seater
5
/
1.5L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
153 BHP
496 hp
340 Nm
675
/
1.5L
/
Turbocharge
/
365
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.