EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs X50 LUX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490 mm
/
1874 mm
/
1613 mm
/
2750 mm
/
/
17
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
6-DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
154 BHP - 156
TBD
6-DCT
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 - 5
/
1.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
153 BHP
154 BHP
340 Nm
/
/
1.5 L
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
X50 LUX
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technologies for security systems
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average fuel efficiency
- The availability of spare parts can be limited
- Less dynamic driving experience
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX50 LUX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose X50 LUX if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while X50 LUX has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while X50 LUX has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while X50 LUX uses No data.