CarteaCompare CarsEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs X95 1.6T

EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs X95 1.6T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

160 km/h

185 km/h

/

4

/

1598 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4490 mm

4858 mm

1874 mm

1925 mm

1613 mm

1780 mm

2750 mm

2855 mm

/

5 Doors

/

210 mm

Fuel Economy

/

12.3 Km/L

/

57 L

/

12.3 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

153 BHP - 305 BHP

197 BHP

TBD

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline

TBD

/

5 Seater

7 Seater

/

1.6 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

153 BHP

197 BHP

340 Nm

290 Nm

/

In-Line

/

1.6 L

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • X95 1.6T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about price; choose X95 1.6T if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while X95 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while X95 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2855 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X95 1.6T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while X95 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.