EQA 250+ vs EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) Comparison

Car Information

8.6

8.2

500-560 km

443

70.5

76.1

14.4-16.4 kWh/100km

/

Engine / Motor

180

190

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7

2,050

/

4,463

5009

1,830

1979

1,620

1750

2,729

3099

/

572

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

100kW

/

Transmission

Single-speed automatic

E-SHIFT (SBW)

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

190 - 300 BHP

215 - 380

Automatic & Single-speed automatic

Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)

Electric

Electric

350 km - 395 km

TBD

5 - 5

6 - 7

Engine

/

SINGLE

Electric

Electric

190

215 BHP

385

350

/

SINGLE

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQA 250+

    • EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Push Button Start
      • Keyless Entry
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Pedestrian airbag
      • Fire Extinguisher
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Lane Departure Warning

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickEQA 250+

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose EQA 250+ if you care more about price; choose EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 250+

    VS

    Jeep | Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 250+

    VS

    Audi | Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 250+

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2020 4.0L GXR GT

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 250+

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2019 4.0L GXR GT

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 250+

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | GLA 250 4MATIC

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, EQA 250+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, EQA 250+ has a wheelbase of 2,729, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a wheelbase of 3099. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air), offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQA 250+ uses Front Drive, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) uses Rear Wheel Drive.