EQM5 2025 vs H7 2.0T Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5040
5095 mm
1910
1875 mm
1569
1485 mm
2990
2970 mm
433
/
Fuel Economy
/
16.7 Km/L
/
70 L
/
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
134 BHP
138 BHP - 228 BHP
DHT
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5
5 Seater
/
1.8 L - 3.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
134 BHP
204 BHP
/
260 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQM5 2025
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
H7 2.0T Comfortable
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 2.0T Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQM5 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose H7 2.0T Comfortable if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQM5 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQM5 2025 has a wheelbase of 2990, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2970 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQM5 2025 uses Front Drive, while H7 2.0T Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.