EQM5 2025 vs Jetta 2.0 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
193 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5040
4659 mm
1910
1778 mm
1569
1482 mm
2990
2651 mm
433
510 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.1 Km/L
/
55 L
/
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
134 BHP
115 BHP - 170 BHP
DHT
7 Speed DSG Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5
5 - 5
/
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
134 BHP
115 BHP
/
170 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQM5 2025
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Jetta 2.0 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJetta 2.0 S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQM5 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose Jetta 2.0 S if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQM5 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Jetta 2.0 S has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQM5 2025 has a wheelbase of 2990, while Jetta 2.0 S has a wheelbase of 2651 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQM5 2025 uses Front Drive, while Jetta 2.0 S uses Front Wheel Drive.