EQM5 2025 vs Pegas 1.4L M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170 km/h
/
4
/
1368 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5040
4300 mm
1910
1700 mm
1569
1460 mm
2990
2570 mm
433
475 L
/
4 Doors
/
150 mm
Fuel Economy
/
13
/
43 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
DHT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
134 BHP
93 BHP - 95
DHT
3 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5
5 - 5
/
1.4 L - 1400 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
/
1.4 L
Electric
Gasoline
134 BHP
95 BHP
/
In-Line
/
4
/
133 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQM5 2025
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Pegas 1.4L M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Average performance on highways
- The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
- Lack of advanced driving techniques
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 2025
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQM5 2025 if you care more about price; choose Pegas 1.4L M/T if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQM5 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQM5 2025 has a wheelbase of 2990, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQM5 2025 uses Front Drive, while Pegas 1.4L M/T uses Front Drive.