Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4650 mm
4771 mm
1844 mm
1870 mm
1661 mm
1828 mm
2725 mm
2790 mm
846 L
/
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
59 L
/
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L
170 BHP - 252 BHP
215 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Electric & Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
252 BHP
215 BHP
352 Nm
280 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2725 mm, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.