Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4650 mm
4490 mm
1844 mm
1874 mm
1661 mm
1613 mm
2725 mm
2750 mm
846 L
/
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
/
59 L
/
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
/
170 BHP - 252 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Electric & Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
252 BHP
305 BHP
352 Nm
680 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) if you care more about power; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2725 mm, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.