CarteaCompare CarsF40 2.3T 6AT vs CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

F40 2.3T 6AT vs CRV EX Full Option (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

165

/

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

4

/

1490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

2

7 Seater

1915

/

4350

4706 mm

1925

1866 mm

1865

1681 mm

2465

2700 mm

520

/

210

/

37

/

31

/

24

/

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

75

58 L

/

11 Km/L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

12.3

/

/

/

Passenger Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

2

/

/

/

Full-size spare tire

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

6AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Electronic part-time 4WD

/

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Double boom/helical spring front independent suspension

/

Five-bar/helical spring non-independent suspension

/

Separate frame construction

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated disc

/

Disc

/

265/65 R17 AT

/

265/65 R17 AT

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 2.4 L

221 BHP - 221 BHP

184 BHP - 190

6AT & 8AT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2

5 Seater - 7

Exterior

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.3T

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

165HP

190 BHP

380

/

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

/

243 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Snow/Sport mode;Comfort/Economy Mode

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • F40 2.3T 6AT

    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Number of Airbags
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • High reliability and durable performance
  • A wide range of security technologies
  • Excellent fuel efficiency

Negative

  • The price is higher than some competitors
  • Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
  • Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors

Related comparisons

Editor's PickF40 2.3T 6AT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose F40 2.3T 6AT if you care more about price; choose CRV EX Full Option (AWD) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, F40 2.3T 6AT has a fuel consumption of No data, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, F40 2.3T 6AT has a wheelbase of 2465, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CRV EX Full Option (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. F40 2.3T 6AT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.