GS Sport 1.8L Classic vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4440 mm
4771 mm
1833 mm
1870 mm
1560 mm
1828 mm
2700 mm
2790 mm
330 L
/
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
2.0 L
130 BHP - 133 BHP
215 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
130 BHP
215 BHP
170 Nm
280 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, GS Sport 1.8L Classic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.