GS Sport 1.8L Classic vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4440 mm
4490 mm
1833 mm
1874 mm
1560 mm
1613 mm
2700 mm
2750 mm
330 L
/
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
/
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
/
130 BHP - 133 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
1.8 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
130 BHP
305 BHP
170 Nm
680 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.