GS Sport 1.8L Classic vs T2 i-DM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
200
/
4
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4440 mm
4785
1833 mm
2006
1560 mm
1875
2700 mm
2800
330 L
752
/
5
/
220
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
18.5
60 L
70 L
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
/
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
1.5
130 BHP - 133 BHP
154 BHP - 600
Automatic
3DHT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
130 BHP
154 BHP
170 Nm
220
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
T2 i-DM
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High fuel efficiency
- Efficient hybrid propulsion system
Negative
- Luggage compartment space is limited
- Lack of digital entertainment options
- Traction ability is not the best in its class
Related comparisons
Editor's PickT2 i-DM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment; choose T2 i-DM if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while T2 i-DM has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, T2 i-DM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while T2 i-DM has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T2 i-DM, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive, while T2 i-DM uses Four Wheel Drive.