Tank 300 Challenger vs CRV EX Full Option (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760
4706 mm
1930
1866 mm
1927
1681 mm
2750
2700 mm
400 L
/
224
/
Fuel Economy
12.1
11 Km/L
75 L
58 L
10 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
184 BHP - 190
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
190 BHP
387 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
CRV EX Full Option (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about fuel economy; choose CRV EX Full Option (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Tank 300 Challenger is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 300 Challenger, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.