Tank 300 Challenger vs Song Plus Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
170
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
5
4760
4775
1930
1890
1927
1680
2750
2765
400 L
574
224
/
/
Flush Door
/
1790
/
19
Fuel Economy
12.1
14.5
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Sensatec Leather
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Seats
Infotainment
12.3
15.6-inch rotating screen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
9
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
DIRAC
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Multi- link(5 links)
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
235/50 R19
265/65 R17
235/50 R19
/
VENTILATED DISC
/
DISC
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
197 BHP - 360 BHP
Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5T
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
319 BHP
387 Nm
520
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
596
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Song Plus Design
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about power; choose Song Plus Design if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while Song Plus Design has a fuel consumption of 6.9. Therefore, Song Plus Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while Song Plus Design has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Song Plus Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while Song Plus Design uses Front Drive.