Tank 300 Challenger vs CX60 2025 High Plus Comparison

Car Information

/

450

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

/

4760

4740

1930

1890

1927

1686

2750

/

400 L

/

224

/

/

20 Inch

Fuel Economy

12.1

/

75 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

12 Inch

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

12

/

Bose

Transmission

Automatic

8-speed Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/65 R17

/

265/65 R17

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

3.3 L - 3.3 L

223 BHP - 342 BHP

280 HP - 284 BHP

Automatic

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

3.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

/

4

/

224 BHP

284 BHP

387 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tank 300 Challenger

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • CX60 2025 High Plus

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX60 2025 High Plus

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about overall equipment; choose CX60 2025 High Plus if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while CX60 2025 High Plus uses Four-Wheel Drive.