Tank 300 Challenger vs EREV RWD Comparison

Car Information

/

1,152 km

/

3.63 kWh/L

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4760

4,825

1930

1,980

1927

1,620

2750

2,940

400 L

/

224

/

Fuel Economy

12.1

/

75 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

/

Transmission

Automatic

Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

265/65 R17

/

265/65 R17

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5 L

223 BHP - 342 BHP

310 - 590

Automatic

Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.

Gasoline & Hybrid

Electric & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

Single Turbo

/

4

/

224 BHP

310

387 Nm

367

/

1,152

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tank 300 Challenger

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • EREV RWD

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickTank 300 Challenger

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about price; choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

    VS

    Haval | H7 Top 2026

    Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

    VS

    Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

    Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

    VS

    Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

    Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

    VS

    BYD | Song Plus Design

    Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

    VS

    Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.