Tank 300 Challenger vs HS5 Basic 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
4 Doors
4760
4760 mm
1930
1907 mm
1927
1700 mm
2750
2870 mm
400 L
453 L
224
130 m
Fuel Economy
12.1
7.1 Km/L
75 L
64 L
10 Km/L
7.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
12
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
221 BHP - 252 BHP
Automatic
8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
221 BHP
387 Nm
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
HS5 Basic 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about fuel economy; choose HS5 Basic 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, Tank 300 Challenger is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS5 Basic 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while HS5 Basic 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.