Tank 300 Challenger vs IM Motors LS7 Luxury AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
239
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4760
5049
1930
2002
1927
1731
2750
3060
400 L
733 + 56 Front Trunk
224
/
/
2630
Fuel Economy
12.1
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic / Single-speed EV
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
AWD
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
223 BHP - 342 BHP
570
Automatic
Automatic / Single-speed EV
Gasoline & Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
570
387 Nm
725
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
IM Motors LS7 Luxury AWD
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Rollover stability control
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about price; choose IM Motors LS7 Luxury AWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while IM Motors LS7 Luxury AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while IM Motors LS7 Luxury AWD has a wheelbase of 3060. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IM Motors LS7 Luxury AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while IM Motors LS7 Luxury AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive.