Tank 300 Challenger vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
/
/
✓
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
N/A
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760
5.075
1930
1.969
1927
1.716
2750
2.930
400 L
/
224
/
Fuel Economy
12.1
/
75 L
74
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
226 BHP
387 Nm
420
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 300 Challenger, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.