Tank 300 Challenger vs Sportage Smartstream 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
220 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
4 Doors
4760
4515 mm
1930
865 mm
1927
1650 mm
2750
2680 mm
400 L
591 L
224
/
Fuel Economy
12.1
12 Km/L
75 L
54 L
10 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Single
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.4 L
224 BHP
130 BHP - 184 BHP
Automatic
7-SPEED DCT & 7-SPEED DCT AUTO TRANSMISSION & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
4
224 BHP
152 BHP
387 Nm
192 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Sportage Smartstream 2.0L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about fuel economy; choose Sportage Smartstream 2.0L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while Sportage Smartstream 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Tank 300 Challenger is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while Sportage Smartstream 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 300 Challenger, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while Sportage Smartstream 2.0L uses Front Wheel Drive.