JAC J5 2016 1.8 vs H7 2.0T Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4590
5095 mm
1765
1875 mm
1465
1485 mm
2710
2970 mm
415
/
Fuel Economy
12.8
16.7 Km/L
55
70 L
/
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
105 BHP
204 BHP - 228 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
204 BHP
165
260 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
JAC J5 2016 1.8
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
H7 2.0T Comfortable
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 2.0T Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose JAC J5 2016 1.8 if you care more about overall equipment; choose H7 2.0T Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, JAC J5 2016 1.8 has a fuel consumption of 7.81, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, H7 2.0T Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, JAC J5 2016 1.8 has a wheelbase of 2710, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2970 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H7 2.0T Comfortable, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. JAC J5 2016 1.8 uses Front Wheel Drive, while H7 2.0T Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.