JAC J5 2016 1.8 vs Jetta 2.0 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
193 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4590
4659 mm
1765
1778 mm
1465
1482 mm
2710
2651 mm
415
510 L
Fuel Economy
12.8
14.1 Km/L
55
55 L
/
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
105 BHP
115 BHP - 170 BHP
Automatic
7 Speed DSG Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
115 BHP
165
170 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
JAC J5 2016 1.8
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Jetta 2.0 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJetta 2.0 S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose JAC J5 2016 1.8 if you care more about interior space; choose Jetta 2.0 S if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, JAC J5 2016 1.8 has a fuel consumption of 7.81, while Jetta 2.0 S has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, Jetta 2.0 S is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, JAC J5 2016 1.8 has a wheelbase of 2710, while Jetta 2.0 S has a wheelbase of 2651 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, JAC J5 2016 1.8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. JAC J5 2016 1.8 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Jetta 2.0 S uses Front Wheel Drive.