Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic vs 5 4WD Premium Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
157
200 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3881
4710 mm
1872
1930 mm
1800
1620 mm
2424
2875 mm
430
367 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
8.0
/
67
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.6 L
/
270 BHP - 285 BHP
295 BHP - 530 BHP
Automatic & Manual
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
483 km - 500 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
280 BHP
530 BHP
280
940 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Seats - Comfort
- Rollover stability control
5 4WD Premium
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick5 4WD Premium
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic if you care more about overall equipment; choose 5 4WD Premium if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while 5 4WD Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2424, while 5 4WD Premium has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5 4WD Premium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic uses All Wheel Drive, while 5 4WD Premium uses Four Wheel Drive.