Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
157
180 km/h
6
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
3881
4400 mm
1872
1830 mm
1800
1590 mm
2424
2630 mm
430
/
/
5
Fuel Economy
8.0
7.1
67
51 L
/
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.6 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
270 BHP - 285 BHP
156 BHP - 197 BHP
Automatic & Manual
7 Speed DCT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
194 BHP
280
290
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Seats - Comfort
- Rollover stability control
C5 TECH 1.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic if you care more about fuel economy; choose C5 TECH 1.5L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2424, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2630 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C5 TECH 1.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6L Automatic uses All Wheel Drive, while C5 TECH 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.