K900 3.8L GDI V6 vs H7 2.0T Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5120 mm
5095 mm
1915 mm
1875 mm
1490 mm
1485 mm
3103 mm
2970 mm
Fuel Economy
8.5 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
/
70 L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.8 L - 5.0 L
1.8 L - 3.0 L
315 BHP - 513 BHP
138 BHP - 228 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
3.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
315 BHP
204 BHP
400 Nm
260 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
K900 3.8L GDI V6
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
H7 2.0T Comfortable
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 2.0T Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose K900 3.8L GDI V6 if you care more about interior space; choose H7 2.0T Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, K900 3.8L GDI V6 has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, H7 2.0T Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, K900 3.8L GDI V6 has a wheelbase of 3103 mm, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2970 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, K900 3.8L GDI V6, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. K900 3.8L GDI V6 uses All Wheel Drive, while H7 2.0T Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.