L5 6.0 V12 vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
4 Seater
5555 mm
5040 mm
2018 mm
1910 mm
1578 mm
1569 mm
3435 mm
2990 mm
/
433 L
Fuel Economy
5 Km/L
/
105 L
/
5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.0 L
/
402 BHP
134 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
6.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
402 BHP
134 BHP
550 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
L5 6.0 V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose L5 6.0 V12 if you care more about interior space; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, L5 6.0 V12 has a fuel consumption of 20, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, L5 6.0 V12 has a wheelbase of 3435 mm, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, L5 6.0 V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. L5 6.0 V12 uses All Wheel Drive, while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.