Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

/

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

/

3460 cc

/

GCC

/

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

5 Doors

/

5115 mm

5209

1980 mm

2010

1920 mm

1731

2850 mm

3110

1004 L

/

235 mm

/

Fuel Economy

9.3 Km/L

/

110 L

/

9.3 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

3.3 L - 5.7 L

/

240 BHP - 409

429 BHP - 543 BHP

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 - 8 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

409 BHP

429 BHP

650 Nm

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L

Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

VS

Mercedes Benz | GLB 250 4MATIC

Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

VS

Lincoln | Aviator 3.0T V6 Base

Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

VS

Lincoln | Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve II

Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

VS

Ford | Ford Expedition 2020 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.