Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR vs Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
3460 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7
/
5 Doors
/
5115 mm
/
1980 mm
/
1920 mm
/
2850 mm
/
1004 L
/
235 mm
/
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.3 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
/
240 BHP - 409
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
/
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 - 8 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
409 BHP
/
650 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLand Cruiser 3.5T EXR
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR if you care more about overall equipment; choose Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.