Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR vs Nissan Patrol Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

/

3460 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

7

7

5 Doors

/

5115 mm

/

1980 mm

/

1920 mm

/

2850 mm

/

1004 L

/

235 mm

/

Fuel Economy

9.3 Km/L

14.4 L/100km

110 L

/

9.3 Km/L

/

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Smart Entry

/

✓

/

Interior

✓

/

✓

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Electric

/

✓

/

✓

/

Standard

/

✓

/

Safety

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Infotainment

9

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Android LCD

/

✓

/

6

/

Transmission

Automatic

9-Speed Automatic Transmission

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

3.3 L - 5.7 L

3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)

240 BHP - 409

275 BHP - 495 BHP

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

LED

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Engine

V

/

3.5 L

3.5L (Twin-Turbo) or 3.8L (Naturally Aspirated)

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

409 BHP

425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)

650 Nm

/

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Nissan Patrol

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Powerful off-road capabilities
    • Exceptional reliability and durability
    • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

    Positive

    • Outstanding off-road performance
    • Outstanding engine power
    • Spacious and luxurious interior design

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Slow electronic system response

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickLand Cruiser 3.5T EXR

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR if you care more about price; choose Nissan Patrol if you care more about fuel economy.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

    VS

    Jeep | Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | GLB 250 4MATIC

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

    VS

    Lincoln | Aviator 3.0T V6 Base

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

    VS

    Lincoln | Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve II

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR

    VS

    Ford | Ford Expedition 2020 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while Nissan Patrol has a fuel consumption of 6.94. Therefore, Nissan Patrol is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Nissan Patrol has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while Nissan Patrol uses No data.