Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR vs Tahoe RST Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
180 km/h
3460 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5115 mm
5181
1980 mm
2053
1920 mm
1925
2850 mm
3071
1004 L
3479
235 mm
/
/
22
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
9.7
110 L
100
9.3 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
Smart Key
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
Jet Black/Victory Red perforated leather seating
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
10.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
8
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
BOSE
Transmission
Automatic
10AT
/
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
/
AT
/
10
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
5.3 L - 6.2 L
240 BHP - 409
320 BHP - 420 BHP
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
10 Speed AT & 10AT & Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
7 Seater - 9 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
6.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
409 BHP
420 BHP
650 Nm
624
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Tahoe RST
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Collision Detection
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tahoe RST if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while Tahoe RST has a fuel consumption of 10.31. Therefore, Tahoe RST is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Tahoe RST has a wheelbase of 3071. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tahoe RST, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while Tahoe RST uses Four-Wheel Drive.