Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic vs 2008 GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
/
4
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4.550
4300
1.840
1987
1.675
1550
2.700
/
506
545
/
17
Fuel Economy
14.7
16.8
58
44
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
❌
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10
/
/
/
/
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
0.0 L - 1.6 L
151 BHP - 190 BHP
110 BHP - 155 BHP
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Engine
2.5 L
1.2
Petrol
Gasoline
188 BHP
130
251
230
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
2008 GT
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic if you care more about price; choose 2008 GT if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while 2008 GT has a fuel consumption of 5.95. Therefore, 2008 GT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic has a wheelbase of 2.700, while 2008 GT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive, while 2008 GT uses Front Drive.