Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs GTR Premium Comparison
Car Information
2.8
/
Engine / Motor
/
315 km/h
/
6
/
European
Dimensions
4
4 Seater
2390
/
5054.6
4710 mm
2070.1
1895 mm
1447.8
1370 mm
2951.48
2780 mm
/
2 Doors
/
249 L
Fuel Economy
12.3
8.5 Km/L
/
72 L
/
8.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/40R20
/
295/35R20
/
Key Spec
4.0 L - 4.0 L
3.8 L
429 HP - 831 hp
485 BHP - 600 BHP
9-speed automatic & AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed & Automatic & SPEEDSHIFT® TCT 9-speed
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 4
2 Seater - 4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
V
4.0L
3.8 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Handcrafted AMG 4.0L V8 biturbo w/rear 150kW permanently synchronous electric motor
/
biturbo
Twin Turbo
831 hp
565 BHP
/
/
831 hp @ 5,500-6,500 rpm
/
1400
637 Nm
1400 Nm@ 2,500-4,500 rpm
/
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE
- Intelligent Emergency Call
GTR Premium
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and excellent driving interaction
- Sporty and luxurious exterior design draws attention
- High-end interior quality and advanced driving technologies
Negative
- High price and large maintenance costs
- Limited driving comfort on normal roads
- Limited space for passengers and luggage
Positive
- Powerful engine performance, suitable for high acceleration
- Excellent control and stability when driving fast
- Bold and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Purchase and maintenance costs are high
- Relatively poor fuel economy
- Ride comfort is limited by suspension stiffness
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about fuel economy; choose GTR Premium if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while GTR Premium has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2951.48, while GTR Premium has a wheelbase of 2780 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GTR Premium uses All Wheel Drive.