Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs Maserati MC20 2023 3.0T V6 Comparison

Car Information

2.8

2.9

Engine / Motor

/

325

/

6

Dimensions

4

2 Seater

2390

/

5054.6

4669

2070.1

1965

1447.8

1221

2951.48

2700

/

150

Fuel Economy

12.3

8.6

/

60

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/40R20

/

295/35R20

/

/

/

Key Spec

4.0 L

3.0 L

462 BHP - 585 BHP

630 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 Seater

2 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

4.0L

3.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

Handcrafted AMG 4.0L V8 biturbo w/rear 150kW permanently synchronous electric motor

/

biturbo

/

831 hp

630 BHP

/

/

831 hp @ 5,500-6,500 rpm

/

1400

730

1400 Nm@ 2,500-4,500 rpm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE

    • Intelligent Emergency Call
  • Maserati MC20 2023 3.0T V6

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Reflectors
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMaserati MC20 2023 3.0T V6

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about fuel economy; choose Maserati MC20 2023 3.0T V6 if you care more about power.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while Maserati MC20 2023 3.0T V6 has a fuel consumption of 11.63. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2951.48, while Maserati MC20 2023 3.0T V6 has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Maserati MC20 2023 3.0T V6 uses Rear Wheel Drive.