Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5080 mm
4,825
1940 mm
1,980
1855 mm
1,620
2970 mm
2,940
668 L
/
Fuel Economy
5.8 Km/L
/
135 L
/
5.8 Km/L
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
4.8 L
1.5 L
280 BHP
310 - 590
Automatic & Manual
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
4.8 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
280 BHP
310
451 Nm
367
/
1,152
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top
- ABS
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Long-term reliability
- Internal capacity and flexible fittings
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Vintage interior design
- Modest technology compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEREV RWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top if you care more about interior space; choose EREV RWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 17.24, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.